Main Menu
Home
Blog
sidetracked
Gallery
Profile
Links
Search
Contact

Imperial Biologists
   Marvin
   XiYu
   WinK
   Anna
   Bio Testament

UK Bloggers
   Joseph
   Kaileng
   Wei Chuen
   Charlotte
   Enxin
   Ee-wen
   Mary
   Shuhui
   Amar
   Vivian
   Sharon
   Ashley
   Fidel
   Chongwai
   Edwin
   Suzi
   Eda
   Kwan Eng

Singapore Bloggers
   Hua Qin
   Otterman
   Zhen Fang
   Stephanie
   Min Yu
   Yolanda
   Geraldine
   Shermeen
   Jia Hui
   Kai Ling
   Mr Budak

Sydney Bloggers
   Sam & Vincy
   Susanna

Nature Blogs
   P. Ubin Stories
   Biology Refugia
   RMBR News
   Habitatnews
   Pulau Hantu
   Labrador Park
   The Blue Tempeh
   WildFilms
   Ubin Volunteers
   Bird Ecology SG

Search

The web
This site


   
    Listed on Blogwise
    Blogarama - The Blog Directory

   Powered by Blogger

     
    [Since 03 Sept 2003]
DOGGED WANDERINGS...

Friday, June 17, 2005

"Britain set for scorching weekend"

Source: BBC news, Fri 17 June 05
"Forecasters are predicting the hottest weekend of the year so far, with temperatures expected to hit 32C (86F).

During the heatwave of 2003 temperatures hit a high of 38.5C in Brogdale, Kent, in August... Some 27,000 people across Europe died directly because of the heat that year. In the UK there were 2,000 deaths caused by the heat - 85% of which were people aged 75 and over."
And in another related article:
"A range of opinions on what 2005 holds, then, but there is one thing most meteorologists are agreed on. Global warming means the UK summers are very slowly getting hotter."
Increasing temperatures worldwide is a global trend which "has seen previous records shattered with increasing regularity". The 1990s were the warmest decade for 1000 years, and the world is getter warmer still. The burning of fossil fuels (coal and oil etc) is the biggest single cause of global warming, in simple terms, by adding heat-trapping gases to the atmosphere.

The UK is on track to meet its targets set out in the Kyoto Protocol, but what difference can it make? The US and Australia have not signed the treaty, believing it to be flawed and potentially disastrous. It's true to a certain extent - the cost of implementing policies outlined in the Protocol will most definitely outweigh its benefits, if the beneficial effects are measurable at all. Even though the majority of the scientific world backs this treaty, many believe that technological innovation is the way to go, and funds should be directed towards dealing with future challenges rather than attempting to change current practices which may be detrimental to a nation's economy.

Hmm I'm in the essayist mode right now... if only the Resource Management paper came first...

1 Comments:

XiYu the Great said...

I was reading my favourite Journal - Nature this morning and Arnie Schwartznegga has signed something to decrease California's CO2 emissions to 20% by 2016 or something.

You should do Pollution and Environmental Plant Phy. next year.

6:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home